Re: DSTM Considered Harmful [Re: (ngtrans) final ngtransagendaforIETF-53 in Minneapolis]

From: Francis Dupont (Francis.Dupont_at_no.spam)
Date: Wed Mar 20 2002 - 11:30:09 PST

• Next message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: (ngtrans) moving to IPv6"
• Previous message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: (ngtrans) The fundamental AutoIPv6 question"
• In reply to: Bound, Jim: "RE: DSTM Considered Harmful [Re: (ngtrans) final ngtransagendaforIETF-53 in Minneapolis]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I agree with Jim, DSTM is ready and I don't understand why we are waiting
for a last call...

Thanks

Francis.Dupont-at-enst-bretagne.fr

• Next message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: (ngtrans) moving to IPv6"
• Previous message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: (ngtrans) The fundamental AutoIPv6 question"
• In reply to: Bound, Jim: "RE: DSTM Considered Harmful [Re: (ngtrans) final ngtransagendaforIETF-53 in Minneapolis]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 06 2006 - 00:00:32 PDT