From: Tom Lohdan (ipv6_at_no.spam)
Date: Sat Nov 17 2001 - 23:47:08 PST
Jim,
Your a nutcase, your values are worthwhile on IPv6, but your constant push
on IPv8 are short of needing a doctor.
Your website describes nothing on IPv8, it only points people to a search
engine. Either you have no idea what your are talking about, or you are
just not bothered to complete your case for IPv8 and are telling people to
search themselves.
The 2002:<ipv4>:: address space will solve nothing at all, your ideals on a
"cost nothing" approach will live as far the nearest IPO and will last as
long them too. 2002 is not the end and be all of IPv6 address space.
.Biz is the only reason you are pushing IPv8, look at your website and the
number of links to Biz information. There is nothing creditable about your
push to IPv8, apart from money promoting it as a .Biz venture, Note the
number of banner advertisements.
Cease and decease with your fantasy about IPv8, unless you wish to provide
the information on your website without referring people to a search engine.
Thanks,
Tom
At 12:20 AM 18/11/2001 +0100, Damien Mascré wrote:
>But as you are claiming everywhere that IPv8/IPv16 could
>solve the problem... I have had a doubt... Your reply
>has cleared that point !
>I conceed that your vision of galaxy is pretty cool and
>that this idea can be re-used in a science fiction book,
>but I think that NATs, proxies, and other adressing tricks
>used by IPv4 are nothing compared to the difficulty of
>setting up IPv8-routed networks.
IPv6 News & Links
http://hs247.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 06 2006 - 00:00:26 PDT